Subject	Yep, larger bumpers and only 139 HP, 11 less than the 240Z.
Posted by	F8IZHIS on February 01, 2002 at 3:42 PM
	This message has been viewed 22 times.
In Reply To	the 74 was okay until they put a cat on it for 74.5 posted by El Guapo (Work) on February 01, 2002 at 03:31 PM
Message	It also weighed 250-300 lbs more.
Follow Ups	Is '74 the only year 260Z's were made, then 280Z... - M0rphe05 15:17:40 02/01/02 74.5 on the 260Z (cat added) I believe the 280ZX was '79 (n/m) - El Guapo (Work) 15:18:54 02/01/02 Cool, thanks guys (n/m) - M0rphe05 15:26:59 02/01/02 `74 ONLY YEAR OF 260Z, 1979 1st year of 280ZX. (n/m) - presto 15:25:39 02/01/02 ru sure? I own a '75 280zx. (n/m) - CRuNK™ 16:27:45 02/01/02 I think you prolly own a 280z...sans X (n/m) - Wingnuttzx™ 16:33:17 02/01/02 doh. (n/m) - CRuNK™ 16:38:52 02/01/02 No you don't. You own a 280Z, if it's a 75. (n/m) - Nion (5.7liter 240Z) 16:37:47 02/01/02 whats a 280z worth? I have been trying to sell mine for $750 - CRuNK™ 16:44:57 02/01/02 I have actually been looking to buy one, 77,78 tho. - Wingnuttzx™ 18:13:03 02/01/02 if you were closer and the body is decent it would be sold (n/m) - AntiHero[seatbelts rock] 21:38:30 02/01/02 History channel video - jdbaker 15:28:54 02/01/02 The underpowered 260Z was made from 1974-1974.5 - F8IZHIS 15:29:12 02/01/02 the 74 was okay until they put a cat on it for 74.5 - El Guapo (Work) 15:31:21 02/01/02 Yep, larger bumpers and only 139 HP, 11 less than the 240Z. - F8IZHIS 15:42:16 02/01/02 my 280ZX only had 132 hp and weighed even more no doubt >> - my91z 15:59:18 02/01/02 hell my old '79 Accord could do burnouts ;-) (n/m) - El Guapo (Work) 16:05:58 02/01/02 we had an '81 Datsun 210 wagon, it wouldn't, lol >> - my91z 16:08:51 02/01/02 i hear there is a 69/70 240z RHD on my AF base i need - HaloZ² 15:48:00 02/01/02 HERE>>>>>>> - willflow 20:18:35 02/01/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.