TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - Yep, larger bumpers and only 139 HP, 11 less than the 240Z.
Subject
Yep, larger bumpers and only 139 HP, 11 less than the 240Z.
Posted by
F8IZHIS
on February 01, 2002 at 3:42 PM
This message has been viewed
22
times.
In Reply To
the 74 was okay until they put a cat on it for 74.5
posted by El Guapo (Work)
on February 01, 2002 at 03:31 PM
Message
It also weighed 250-300 lbs more.
Follow Ups
Is '74 the only year 260Z's were made, then 280Z...
-
M0rphe05
15:17:40 02/01/02
74.5 on the 260Z (cat added) I believe the 280ZX was '79 (n/m)
-
El Guapo (Work)
15:18:54 02/01/02
Cool, thanks guys (n/m)
-
M0rphe05
15:26:59 02/01/02
`74 ONLY YEAR OF 260Z, 1979 1st year of 280ZX. (n/m)
-
presto
15:25:39 02/01/02
ru sure? I own a '75 280zx. (n/m)
-
CRuNK™
16:27:45 02/01/02
I think you prolly own a 280z...sans X (n/m)
-
Wingnuttzx™
16:33:17 02/01/02
doh. (n/m)
-
CRuNK™
16:38:52 02/01/02
No you don't. You own a 280Z, if it's a 75. (n/m)
-
Nion (5.7liter 240Z)
16:37:47 02/01/02
whats a 280z worth? I have been trying to sell mine for $750
-
CRuNK™
16:44:57 02/01/02
I have actually been looking to buy one, 77,78 tho.
-
Wingnuttzx™
18:13:03 02/01/02
if you were closer and the body is decent it would be sold (n/m)
-
AntiHero[seatbelts rock]
21:38:30 02/01/02
History channel video
-
jdbaker
15:28:54 02/01/02
The underpowered 260Z was made from 1974-1974.5
-
F8IZHIS
15:29:12 02/01/02
the 74 was okay until they put a cat on it for 74.5
-
El Guapo (Work)
15:31:21 02/01/02
Yep, larger bumpers and only 139 HP, 11 less than the 240Z. -
F8IZHIS
15:42:16 02/01/02
my 280ZX only had 132 hp and weighed even more no doubt >>
-
my91z
15:59:18 02/01/02
hell my old '79 Accord could do burnouts ;-) (n/m)
-
El Guapo (Work)
16:05:58 02/01/02
we had an '81 Datsun 210 wagon, it wouldn't, lol >>
-
my91z
16:08:51 02/01/02
i hear there is a 69/70 240z RHD on my AF base i need
-
HaloZ²
15:48:00 02/01/02
HERE>>>>>>>
-
willflow
20:18:35 02/01/02
Post a
Followup
You cannot reply to this message because you are not
logged in
.